So, I'm a Fedora packager. I can look into packaging the old Unison version alongside the bleeding-edge version. I imagine (hope) it'd be as simple as pulling the old .spec file from CVS and renaming the package. So, we might end up with: unison # Always the latest unison2.13 # Fixed at a certain release unison2.10 # Fixed at a certain release Eventually, if/when unison gets upgraded to something else, we would then grow unison2.27 too. Would Fedora accept this compatibility package? It seems that the naming would be "unison2.13" to follow the naming conventions of Debian/Ubuntu and Cygwin. Should we even have the "moving"/"unversioned" unison package, or only packages with the version in the package name? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
