On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:30:31PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:21 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > > Personally, if you could script opening a BZ, I'd welcome that. > > I don't like the idea of programs opening bugzilla reports. Many issues > like this can change for reasons entirely out of my control (transient > network outage, breakage in underlying libraries or toolchain, etc.). > > First, ideally we would have a way for people to contribute checks like > this for the Fedora infrastructure, rather than running it on their > personal computers. Agreed. No reason this couldn't be run on Infrastructure hardware. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR describes how to request such. My rebuilds, however, really appreciate having more hardware to throw at the problem than infrastructure has on hand. Fortunately I have that hardware available for this use (7 multi-socket multi-core systems right now). Running this on Infrastructure hardware (really, the koji builders) would adversely impact koji builds. > Second, we should have a way for software to add to a "problem feed", > something that would be exported as RSS. So for example, Matt's > "rebuild everything for rawhide" script could add a notice "your package > failed to rebuild". I'm open to adding something like this, but have zero experience generating RSS feeds, much less one feed per person (presumably). Advice would be appreciated. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
