On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:05:22AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:19:49 -0700 > orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Orion Poplawski) wrote: > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. > > > > > > - There are 685 lines in this run, 561 lines in the previous run, > > > 620 lines in the one before that, and 700 in the one before that, so > > > things seem to be going up and down. ;( > > > > > > - Should I keep running this? Do folks find it useful? yes. > > > - Should I try and spam maintainers? Or just keep posting in the > > > list? > > > > List. > > Yeah, thats my inclination, but the problem is that the count doesn't > seem to be going down much. Ie, many of the maintainers with packages > affected seem to be not seeing it here. I spam everyone with a failed package in my reports. Most responses are "thanks, fixed now", with the occasional "not my problem, it's another package's problem", and of course my favorite "not my problem, your scripts are broken!" :-) Because I'm only running it monthly or so right now, it doesn't seem to be so much mail that the package owners get upset. Yours is interesting, and often trivial to fix, but I wouldn't send it more than monthly to everyone personally. BTW, I fixed biosdevname (add permalink/ in the URL). I can't fix pgp-tools because upstream rarely releases tarballs, I have to build it out of svn directly, so please add that to your exclude list. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
