Le samedi 16 février 2008 à 14:21 +0200, Yanko Kaneti a écrit : > On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 12:12 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > This is much more user friendly than expecting the right default to > > exist in glibc, and users to know it. Let alone expecting users to > > manage to get a new variant included in glibc. > > A <sarcasm> tag missing?. Please, this is so completely backwards. It's not. > IMO targeting Joe Average means only choices of UI language and > location. That windows has had a more complex setup for a very long time even though windows has historically sucked big time at i18n & l10n and only cared about major locales should be a pretty good hint this is not sufficient. > And for that matter it would be good if these two are auto > preselected based on whatever data the installer could gather (bios > settings, real IP). Deity preserve us from the smarter-than-you computer. > The duple of UI language and location should give enough for reasonable > defaults everywhere, not having those defaults, in glibc or other parts > of the stack should be considered a bug. Just curious, have you ever had to interact with glibc devs on locale data? Pulling teeth is less painful. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
