On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 17:14 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:12:39PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > ...in all cases but I have a hard time imagining a case where I'd > > want access cut off to an existing, running session just because > > someone else might want to check their email on a different account > > and they do it from a VT instead of Xnest. > > It has been said before. Imagine if someone left a mic snooping > program running on Session #1 while Session #2 came along and started > talking on the phone? This kind of thing should be prevented BY > DEFAULT. Just to make it more complicated MIC = INPUT != OUTPUT :-) Ie, the security problem is most likly with input channels, although most of the complains come on how the output channels are managed. Just food for thought, I am not pending in either direction. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
