On Feb 12, 2008 6:39 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12 Feb 2008 17:22:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Erm, well first we have someone dismayed that we didn't discuss > > Haskell and then we're told it's pointless to discuss Haskell without > > you or Jens present. And I do find that odd because as far as I know > > the process so far has been driven by Yaakov and I wasn't aware that > > either you or Jens were to be involved. > > The question becomes... is Yaakov drafting as it stands incorporating > input from the haskell maintainers? Yaakov is on the watchbugs and > watchcommits for ghc.. so its not like the maintainers of the package > are unknown to him. I really hope he's been proactive about engaging > the affected maintainers in the space, before approaching the > committee. My original goal was to get xmonad into Fedora. I found that packaging Haskell packages requires some care, but can be done pretty quickly, so I decided doing things in full would be better. My impression was that Bob and Jens were busy, and didn't have the time to push things forward, so I figured the best way to do this would be to do it myself. In a way though, this is with some direction from Bob if not from Jens as well, as the bulk of the standard is based on the design behind Bob's program cabal-rpm. I plan on putting together some changes, but I've been delayed from one task to another. Now that I have both Bob's and Jen's, I also want to say I want to ask about making some changes to how GHC is packaged. Again, it is something I wanted to put together some details for first. -Yaakov -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list