On Saturday 09 February 2008, Les Mikesell wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:35:14PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > >> What real use is that? The point of relying on some after-EOL-mainenance > >> is to be able to extend the life for some definite time. > > > > It is better than nothing, and it would be wrong to advertise something > > wrong. As a side note, it is the same for Fedora, packages may be > > orphaned within the timespan of the release. > > If a package is orphaned within the release timespan but a security > exploit is subsequently published that affects the shipped version, > would the users be left on their own to fix it? no the security team would get a fix out there. Dennis -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
