Re: a plan for updates after end of life

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:35:14PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
What real use is that? The point of relying on some after-EOL-mainenance is
to be able to extend the life for some definite time.

It is better than nothing, and it would be wrong to advertise something
wrong. As a side note, it is the same for Fedora, packages may be orphaned within the timespan of the release.

If a package is orphaned within the release timespan but a security exploit is subsequently published that affects the shipped version, would the users be left on their own to fix it?

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux