Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:35:14PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
What real use is that? The point of relying on some after-EOL-mainenance is
to be able to extend the life for some definite time.
It is better than nothing, and it would be wrong to advertise something
wrong. As a side note, it is the same for Fedora, packages may be
orphaned within the timespan of the release.
If a package is orphaned within the release timespan but a security
exploit is subsequently published that affects the shipped version,
would the users be left on their own to fix it?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
