On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:03:21 -0900 "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Feb 10, 2008 12:28 PM, Jaroslaw Gorny <jaroslav@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:32:51 -0900 > > "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > It's absolutely possible for someone to build the > > > bits so that livna rpm packages are part of the choices once > > > livna-release package is installed. > > > > How could that be? Now it is not legal even to display a message > > like: > > "If you are outside US, you can use packages from livna.org" > > So, would it be legal to point users to livna RPMS with an offer to > > install? > > You quoted the statement that answers this, maybe I didn't say it loud > enough.... > ONCE THE LIVNA RELEASE PACKAGE IS INSTALLED > > I did not say... by default. Ah, OK, you're right, sorry, I've misunderstood that. > Look here's the deal. We can't tell people go to livna for this or > that package. But it seems like we do have the ability to tell people > that livna exists.. if we do not abuse that ability by pointing to > livna for specific things. > (...) Wouldn't it be a potential problem? It's nothing else than 'indirect' advisory. Like "Look, I won't tell you where you can buy a gun, but please visit the guy at the corner of X and Y, he's got a lot of interesting stuff". I'm perfectly OK with that, but would US-law be as well? > What I need...what the board needs...what the Fedora community > needs... are people who are willing to do the technical work make > steps 3 and 4 and work on the integration issues. This would require changes in codeina as well I suppose. Codeina (src) is hosted @ fluendo.com - will they accept that? regards, -- jarek -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
