On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 17:54 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 16:11 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I see a few Perl packages with a changelog like that: > > > * Sun Feb 10 2008 Ralf Corsépius <rc040203 <at> freenet.de> - 0.89-3 > > > - Rebuild for gcc43. > > > > > > * Tue Jan 15 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa <at> redhat.com> - 0.89-2 > > > - rebuild for new perl > > > > This is bad! You're rebuilding the package again with the old Perl in dist-f9, > > so when dist-f9-perl gets merged, you'll have an EVR problem. > I am rebuilding the packages against what is in CVS (aka dist-f9). > > > Now these > > packages need to be bumped and built for dist-f9-perl again! > There is nothing I can do, if the "nominal perl" (dist-f9) collides with > packages on another (unofficial) branch. I assume the Perl rebuild is for Perl 5.10.0? I hope so. There are fixes in that version I want. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list