On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:43 +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > > I'd say that depends entirely on whether glade3 can handle all glade > > files produced by glade2. Can it ? > > http://glade.gnome.org/ says: "...respects the same XML format as > glade-2" However, I am yet to verify the truthfulness of this claim. I > plan to look into it once I am finished with Anjuta. > > In case they are incompatible and we decide to continue with Glade2, > then we might need to drop Anjuta, since Anjuta will most likely have > Glade3 as a dependency. Or would we then want to split Anjuta into > -plugins or -glade3? I don't see any issue with letting glade2 and glade3 coexist for a while. And I don't expect there to be any explicit incompatibility, I just fear that there may be some issues when using glade3 on glade files that have been produced by glade2. Either way, I really hope that we will soon see a ui builder that supports the GtkBuilder format. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
