On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 19:30 +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > Looking at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/comps/comps-f9.xml.in?view=markup > I find that Glade2 and Anjuta are marked as default and optional > respectively. While Glade 3.4.1 (separate package from Glade2) is > already there in the repositories, we are soon going to have a fresh > new Anjuta package (atleast 2.2.3) in Fedora. > > However, the latest versions of Anjuta -- both 2.2.3 (stable) and > 2.3.x (unstable) -- need Glade3 for its Glade plugin to work. So can > we consider replacing Glade2 by Glade3 in the comps-f9.xml.in for > Fedora 9? As far as I know, this would affect the Live Developer Spin > and the non-live GNOME DVD. > > What do you think? > I'd say that depends entirely on whether glade3 can handle all glade files produced by glade2. Can it ? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
