2008/2/5 Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>: > In preparation to asking FESCo to amend the feature process, I'd like to > find out if there is going to be an uprising from y'all against the > idea. > > Currently, the feature process does not specifically require release > notes or documentation, nor provide for FESCo to block a feature because > of missing or poor feature documentation. We think the feature > policy[1] should be amended[2] to require this. > > It is clear in the spirit and the letter of the current policy that some > amount of content from the feature owners is required. The policy makes > these related points: > > * It's a feature, we're trying to make noise about it, and the > rest of the world needs meaningful content about the feature It's my feature, I'm willing to shout out about it. In fact I want everyone to know what I did. If they didn't who would bother to use what I put together? +1 -Yaakov -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
