On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:47:47 -0500 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:07:35 -0800 > "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In preparation to asking FESCo to amend the feature process, I'd like > > to find out if there is going to be an uprising from y'all against the > > idea. > > > Well, I'm afraid of requiring more out of the feature proposers, and > thus making it more likely that they'll just quietly do the work > anyway, not make it a proposed feature, and just move on to the next > task. I don't see a problem with that at all. If they don't care enough to shout about the feature they're working on, it's not important enough for it to be a feature. Conversely, if someone other than the developer wants to shout about it as a feature, then they can write the documentation. IMHO, we have entirely too many things that are _barely_ features or are quite nebulous. I fear we play a bit too much "keeping up with the Ubuntus". If we want to tout something as a feature, we should be willing to write up why. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
