Re: bodhi 0.4.10 features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/01/2008, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jon Stanley <jonstanley <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Yep.  I just came up with a catchy slogan for this: "the rule of ones"
> > (OK, maybe not so catchy :) ).  ONE bug == ONE problem in ONE release
> > (F7, F8, and rawhide).  It's even got a big red box in
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/BugLifeCycle :)
>
> This is entirely unworkable in practice.

Care to flesh out that statement a bit?

> I therefore agree with Mamuro Tasaka,
> Ralf Corsépius and others and completely oppose this policy.

I've ignored some of the unhelpful comments by those above and I'd be
grateful if you'd not follow down the same path. It would be good to
know _why_ you oppose it.


> The Bodhi feature of being able to not close bugs automatically was requested
> by several maintainers and implemented at their request, taking it back
> constitutes a huge regression.

Agreed.

Cheers

-- 
Christopher Brown

http://www.chruz.com

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux