On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:50:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Luke Macken wrote, at 01/28/2008 07:54 AM +9:00: > >> It's actually NEXTRELEASE, instead of CURRENTRELEASE (correction sent to > >> devel-announce). As for rationale behind this decision, I'm not quite > >> sure, I just wrote the code :) Jon Stanley/QA/FESCo could probably shed more > >> light on this. > > > I disagree. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=bug_status.html#status > > says: > > Yes, this choice is surely 100% broken. I could see either > CURRENTRELEASE or ERRATA as sane. Agreed. Waiting to hear back from Jon as to what he meant by it; in the mean time, I've reverted bodhi back to using CURRENTRELEASE. Sorry for the confusion. Jon's proposal[0] was approved at the last FESCo meeting, but it doesn't specify what to close the bugs as. John Poelstra's bug workflow[1] page illustrates Jon's proposal, but specifies that bugs be closed as RAWHIDE. I agree with Tom that either ERRATA or CURRENTRELEASE are probably the most sane, but we definitely need to come to a consensus, and make it official. luke [0]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JonStanley/BugWorkflow [1]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra/BugLifeCycle -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
