On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:46:34AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:06:08 -0500 > "Jon Stanley" <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm not sure what the purpose of RAWHIDE here is....it's obviously not > > rawhide by the time that it hits stable. The important thing to take > > away from what was decided at FESCo is that the checkbox to not > > auto-close bugs is/will be no more. > > WHAT? That's not what I voted for at all in FESCo. I voted that you > can opt-out of auto bug handling, at which point all bets are off and > we won't touch a bug at all. But if you stay opted in for bug > handling, you get our handling, you don't get to pick and choose what > happens. All or nothing. Not no choice at all. So, it seems as if there is lots of confusion as to what got approved during the last FESCo meeting. Until an official decision has been made, I've reverted bodhi back to it's previous behavior -- which allows devs to opt out of bodhi's bug-mangling. luke -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
