Re: [Guideline] Release number for rebuilds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:18:19 +0100
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> and you can patch and bump F-8 to 3%{?dist} without updating "devel".
> Your branches get out-of-sync. And next time you bump release in "devel",
> the release value may become the same as in older branches, but nothing
> guarantees that the spec file becomes the same.

Well as noticed earlier, there is no multisync in devel so this is not an issue
at all. Since upstream does not know if there and when there will be a
replacement I have split out msynctool as its own package a while back.
The multisync gui never was really stable or usable anyway.

- Andreas

-- 
Andreas Bierfert, B.Sc.        | http://awbsworld.de      | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierfert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://lowlatency.de     | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373         | cell: +49 173 5803043    | mail preferred

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux