Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka <at> ntfs-3g.org> writes: [...] > > If you're interested then you may read the text starting at "The big > > change this time is ..." at the below URL for the explanation why you're > > misunderstanding the situation: > > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ntfs-3g.devel/392 > Well, your arguments are pretty unconvincing, and apply to a lot of > application-library relationships, still usually library users won't fork a > library just for that, or when they do, Fedora won't ship their fork. AFAIU this is an /upstream/ decision, not a Fedora one. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
