Re: Requesting feedback for unaccepted Fedora features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Poelstra schrieb:
Dear Proposed Feature Owners,

The following feature pages are in CategoryProposedFedora9 which indicates that the feature owner is requesting that FESCo vote on them at the next meeting. I have not raised these features to FESCo for a vote because certain parts of the pages are incomplete and it doesn't make sense for FESCo to review a feature when all the information is not present.

...
4) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureEncryptedFilesystems -- documentation and release notes sections are empty (2008-01-14)


I've added / moved some stuff to the documentation section and added some release notes.

 Karsten

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux