Re: pike packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "jr" == josef radinger <cheese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

jr> I would need someone willing to review the pike-packages.

All I can say is, first submit pike itself and get it reviewed.  If
you have many library packages which will need review, submit a couple
of them along with a set of packaging guidelines so that the packaging
committee can help you to get them to an acceptable state.  Then start
submitting the rest of your addon packages according to those
guidelines.

Honestly, there is very little chance that anyone in the pool of
reviewers is going to know anything at all about pike, and so it is an
absolute must that we have proper guidelines that will enable us to
review those packages.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux