On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 11:33 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:21:06 -0500 > David Mansfield <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 12:14 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:10:50 -0500 > > > David Mansfield <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Would such a proposal > > > > have a chance? > > > > > > Not likely, but I can't say that without a proposal in front of me. > > > > > > > Ok. > > > > Thanks for listening. > > He did. You said "changes to workflow and cycle management" without > enumerating what those were. Since LTS is something that rel-eng isn't > going to support, anything other than minor changes wouldn't likely be > received well. But it's sort of hard to say "it might have a chance" > when we don't even know what "it" is. I was not being sarcastic. I have heard no additional support from my idea, and I'm just going to let it die. Almost every response was negative. I was literally thanking everyone for listening and taking the time to give honest and valid feedback. David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
