Jos Vos wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:48:16PM +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Well, I actually use Fedora in a strong production environment (power
control office). The current policy (the EOL of F<n> is one month after
the F<n+2>) provides me one year LTS (assuming the release is per
half-year). Thus I just skip one release, i.e. FC1-->FC3-->FC5-->F7 .
One-year LTS is an acceptable compromise for me. But ideally, from the
"production" point of view, I would prefer 9-month cycle (and hence
1.5year LTS) ...
Wondering what the difference with using RHEL/CentOS + EPEL is then...
For example, I use tickless kernel now (which seems to be fine on old
slow machines), whereas RHEL still use and will use the old kernel. Ans
so on...
~buc
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
