Dnia 22-01-2008, wto o godzinie 13:45 -0500, Matthias Clasen pisze: > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 00:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > System-config-display has a hard dependency on metacity while it is not > > required at all in say the KDE or Xfce spin. I believe the ideal > > solution would be to have add a virtual provides to all the window > > managers and then depend on it from system-config-display > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427814 > > > > What would be the best way to move ahead with this now? File individual > > bug reports against each of them? > > Have you checked why s-c-d has a dependency on metacity ?! > > It is there because it runs metacity if there is no X server/wm around. > Having twm installed will help little for that... > What about eg. fvwm instead of twm? twm doesn't look familiar for GNOME/KDE user at all... -- Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek http://liviopl.jogger.pl/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= =?UTF-8?Q?_wiadomo=C5=9Bci?= podpisana cyfrowo
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
