Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:58 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I've prepared a new glew release (1.5.0) to push to rawhide, nothing special
really just a bugfix release, but still upstream decided to bump the version
from 1.5.0 to 1.4.0 and even though there is no ABI breakage, thus change the
soname from libGLEW.so.1.4 to libGLEW.so.1.5 causing explicit ABI breakage :(
Ick. Perhaps consider beating upstream into using DT_SONAME of
libGLEW.so.1 ?
In my experience upstream doesn't answer mail, not ever, don't ask why, thats
just how things are. Note that I'm all for this change, and I'm also in contact
with the debian glew maintainer, so I could even coordinate it with Debian, but
I don't feel like even trying to ask upstream.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
