Naheem Zaffar wrote: > I think Fedora did use some sort of preloading (well, atleast > Readahead), but it was decided that there was no tangible benefit from > it in the way it was being done. > Well, I looked into the readahead util for boot time, and it seemed to hurt more than help. But ongoing preload that learns & adjusts to usage patterns could help I'm sure, if done right -Eric (while waiting for the one long boot of OS X 10.5 after a system update, as it updates its caches for the *next* fast boot...) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
