On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 00:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 10.01.08 09:59, Jonathan Dieter (jdieter@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 01:49 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > <snip> > > > I don't think this BZ excerpt is any good as argument for your > > > point. A big share of the bugs listed for PA are duplicates. BZ is > > > very good for burying people in vast amount of emails due to new or > > > updated bug reports. My main job is hacking on PA, not wading through > > > BZ. Which is why I tend to ignore bugzilla as good as I can and clean > > > it up only just before every release. > > <snip> > > > > I really appreciate what you do with pulseaudio, but I'm not quite sure > > what to make of this comment. What do you want us to do if we come > > across a pulseaudio bug? > > Report it via BZ or PA BTS! (Exactly like you did) > > I ask everyone to be patient, though. I do fix look at those bug > reports and fix them, but only shortly before the next release. Ok, excellent. That's all I wanted to know! > The point of my mail is just that statistics about the "buggyness" of > software based on bugzilla data is bogus. Fair enough. And you did make a compelling argument. > > For example, when pulseaudio is running as a system-wide daemon, any > > games using Alsa start to stutter after a few minutes. In single-user > > mode, they work perfectly. I opened a bug for this a month ago > > ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417681 ), and I've not > > gotten any response yet. Now I realize this is probably a low-priority > > for you, but I guess I was hoping for at least an ACK. > > Uh, system-wide mode is not really supported anyway. On Fedora I chose > to setup PA as a session service, and that's what is supported. But > that's a different story. Yeah, I know it's not really supported, but for my situation (where I don't want pulseaudio being shutdown on logout and I want all users to be able to access it), it fits. I expect that my bug will be at the bottom of the list, and that's not a problem. I'm just hoping it gets looked at sometime. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
