Re: Fedora too cutting edge?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 01:49 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
<snip>
> I don't think this BZ excerpt is any good as argument for your
> point. A big share of the bugs listed for PA are duplicates. BZ is
> very good for burying people in vast amount of emails due to new or
> updated bug reports. My main job is hacking on PA, not wading through
> BZ. Which is why I tend to ignore bugzilla as good as I can and clean
> it up only just before every release.
<snip>

I really appreciate what you do with pulseaudio, but I'm not quite sure
what to make of this comment.  What do you want us to do if we come
across a pulseaudio bug?

For example, when pulseaudio is running as a system-wide daemon, any
games using Alsa start to stutter after a few minutes.  In single-user
mode, they work perfectly.  I opened a bug for this a month ago
( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417681 ), and I've not
gotten any response yet.  Now I realize this is probably a low-priority
for you, but I guess I was hoping for at least an ACK.

Will you eventually get around to looking at it or is BZ redirected
to /dev/null for you (which is how I read the above excerpt, though it
may not be what you meant).

Please understand I'm not trying to jump on you, I just want to know the
best way of reporting a bug to you.

Jonathan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux