Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:17 -0800, Andrew Farris wrote:
> And the interesting thing is it looks like /dev/sdX will 'stay stable' as the 
> way its done after that change.  Change happens. :)

I wouldn't put my money on it.. maybe it's stable (for some definition
of the word) now, probably not in a few years.

(Interestingly enough, one price Fedora pays for this so-called
stability is that booting is somewhat slower, e.g. crap like
scsi_wait_scan.ko)

     David


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux