Re: regressions (was: Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?])

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora <at> leemhuis.info> writes:
> Now: seems so afaics. But when it was new it was a regression for quite
> a bunch of people. That's bad and we should avoid regressions as much as
> possible. Just like the kernel developers do -- Torvalds on lkml yells

While I agree regressions are annoying, and thus perceived as a very bad thing, 
in practice regressions are less of a problem than unfixed bugs: if there's a 
regression, you can rollback to a working package, if there are unfixed bugs, 
you have nothing to upgrade or downgrade to.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux