On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:18:25 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - we could have delayed juju until F8 (or even F9) > - we could have included juju in F7 (as we did) and made it optional > (either enabled or disabled by default) > > I think the latter is the better solution and a serious option for one > release. And if we had chosen that, it likely still wouldn't be where it is today, because it wouldn't have had the exposure. It was functional for the vast majority of uses and the exposure got more and more things fixed on it. If there was an alternative then everybody would just switch back to the old method, and no bugs would get filed and no corner cases would get discovered. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
