On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 19:48 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> | kill(pid, SIGTERM); /* wait for timeout/sigchld */ kill(pid, SIGKILL); > > > > Imho there is some code missing, that the pid really belongs to the > > service, > > no; as already written, modern initsystems use non-forking daemons where > such checks are not needed anymore. > > > e.g. when the service died/crashed and the pid file still exists > > pidfiles are ancient hacks not required by modern initsystems anymore. That's just not true, for example: http://www.initng.org/browser/initng-ifiles/trunk/initfiles/daemon/exim/listener.ii ...maybe you mean that they support it, and _in your opinion_ application code should change to use that model ... but that's a very different thing. -- James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
