Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> | kill(pid, SIGTERM); /* wait for timeout/sigchld */ kill(pid, SIGKILL); > > Imho there is some code missing, that the pid really belongs to the > service, no; as already written, modern initsystems use non-forking daemons where such checks are not needed anymore. > e.g. when the service died/crashed and the pid file still exists pidfiles are ancient hacks not required by modern initsystems anymore. > , a wrong process can be killed here. Also I guess it would be better > to first try to SIGTERM the all services that should be terminated, > then wait, and then send the SIGKILL instead of waiting for each > process independently. stop sequence happens in reverted order and can be done in parallel, but there must by synchronization points (e.g. 'httpd' + 'ftpd' -> sync -> 'udhcpc' -> sync -> 'udevd') Enrico -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
