Re: Another selinux rant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 18:05 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 5:51 PM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > That could be the case. Perhaps there's something that could be added
> > > to Smolt to allow the history of avc denials to be uploaded as part of
> > > the profile - that would allow some really interesting analysis.
> >
> > Smolt has been collecting this information, but it has not yet been
> > published on the web site (hopefully soon).
> 
> Smolt doesn't collect that information, and that seems like a bad idea
> for something for Smolt to collect.  Well, if you wanted to make
> something like kerneloops, but called selinuxoops, then maybe we can
> link Smolt information together on an opt-in basis.  I'm not sure what
> you would gain by knowing what kind of CPU generated an SELinux error,
> it would be no different than diagnosing permissions problems
> remotely.  It's all in the software.

I don't know all the details but I do know smolt is collecting the
number of users who are leaving selinux turned on vs off.  I haven't
heard anything about AVC denial counts and stuff like that.  Hopefully
we will soon have published numbers about how many people are 'happily'
running with selinux.

-Eric

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux