On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 18:05 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 5:51 PM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > That could be the case. Perhaps there's something that could be added > > > to Smolt to allow the history of avc denials to be uploaded as part of > > > the profile - that would allow some really interesting analysis. > > > > Smolt has been collecting this information, but it has not yet been > > published on the web site (hopefully soon). > > Smolt doesn't collect that information, and that seems like a bad idea > for something for Smolt to collect. Well, if you wanted to make > something like kerneloops, but called selinuxoops, then maybe we can > link Smolt information together on an opt-in basis. I'm not sure what > you would gain by knowing what kind of CPU generated an SELinux error, > it would be no different than diagnosing permissions problems > remotely. It's all in the software. I don't know all the details but I do know smolt is collecting the number of users who are leaving selinux turned on vs off. I haven't heard anything about AVC denial counts and stuff like that. Hopefully we will soon have published numbers about how many people are 'happily' running with selinux. -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list