On Jan 4, 2008 4:57 PM, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Because most of the time it's an selinux policy bug. Granted, not > always, but often enough to make ones first thought be "oh, must be an > selinux problem, Ill turn it off" or "must be an selinux polciy > problem I'll run audit2allow and report a bug" - both of which are > suggested EVERY TIME by setroubleshoot. A naive user is then led to > think that this is the right thing to do in all instances. I have to say, it appears that my experiences with SELinux have been much different from yours. I must admit however, that I do not run SELinux on my desktops, maybe that's the issue -- I don't connect my desktop directly to the internet either however, nor do I store that much data on them. <snip> > I fear you're in the minority of users. Look over at the users > forum/lists and see how many times you see people turning off > selinux... Have you considered the possibility of a large silent majority for whom it works most of the time and so need not complain? Not that valid complaints are a bad thing. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
