Re: Policy proposal for compatibility packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell <lesmikesell <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Change your terminology to 'pre-compiled' and 're-compiled' because it 
> really doesn't relate to code being proprietary or not, only when it was 
> compiled.  And then you also see why the -devel doesn't matter.

That assumes the Free programs you're rebuilding actually rebuild against the 
new version of the library. The #1 reason compat libraries are needed is that 
this is not the case (due to API changes).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux