Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
There is a difference between compatible library packages and
compatible development packages. Compatible libraries make long term
sense. Compat development packages don't.
By shipping libraries, even compat ones, without a -devel package, we'd be
advantaging proprietary apps over Free ones. :-(
Change your terminology to 'pre-compiled' and 're-compiled' because it
really doesn't relate to code being proprietary or not, only when it was
compiled. And then you also see why the -devel doesn't matter.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
