Re: Broken deps in the stable release are not acceptable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:55:08AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
For that, we could make a bodhi policy. Cause no rules say all package
Must go to testing-update before move to stable one.
You are right. I thought we already had policy for that but the wiki
says:
"If you feel that community testing is unnecessary for your update, you
can choose to push it straight to the stable fedora-updates repository
instead."

IMO this is wrong, it should only be allowed for security updates.

I disagree. In my case nobody ever noticed the regressions in testing
even for my packages that are widely used. And for the packages that correspond with a niche of users, of course I never got any feedback in bodhi.

Given that it seems that there isn't a lot of people using testing it
seems to me that for niche software it would be better to go straight to
stable.


+1

Not to mention updates which aren't updates but new packages.

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux