On Dec 29, 2007 2:48 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For fixing broken deps its reasonable to bypassing testing, since the > assuption is the current package is already un-installable. Bugs marked > 'urgent' is a complete waste of time - everyone thinks their own bug > is urgent / important. If someone enters a BZ and marks it urgent I'll > typically put it at the bottom of my TODO list because it usually isn't > urgent at all ;-P Similarly 'serious bug' is kind of hard to define as > a formal policy - you need to enumerate a reasonable set of scenarios > which are considered serious. 'broken deps' is one good example of a > serious bug. data corruption, app is "unuseable" ... etc. but I think the best solution is "trust the maintainer" .. he should be able to judge if the update is urgent or not ... if not he should not be a maintainer at all. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
