Re: Broken deps in the stable release are not acceptable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:06:10 +0100
Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What strikes me here is that we don't have a tooling that would avoid
> this. Maybe ti wouldn't be so hard to hook some scripts to bodhi that
> won't let a package out if it causes a dependency to be unsatisfiable
> or it itself have an unmet dependency.


The problem continues to be the time it takes to calculate that,
particularly when you have to generate multilib sets to ensure you
don't break anything in the multilib set.  Luke has been working off
and on on doing depchecking at some points of a bodhi push cycle, but
it's a tough problem to solve.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux