On Dec 21, 2007 11:22 AM, King InuYasha <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 21, 2007 11:11 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > King InuYasha wrote: > > > I would have to agree with Chris and Bryan regarding Anaconda and the > > > icon style. It seems that Anaconda has had more and more features tacked > > > on it since its inception so long ago. Has Anaconda ever been rewritten > > > or has anyone even considered rewriting Anaconda? The icon style issue > > > could be fixed once the Echo Icons are finished... if they do get > > > finished.... > > > > Pretty much all software gets features tacked on over time. I didn't > > hear the review suggest anything close to a rewrite and a rewrite would > > be absolutely pointless anyway > > > > > > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html > > > > Echo would get finished faster if there was more contributors. > > > > Rahul > > > > Ps: Don't top post. > > > > > Well, my beef with Anaconda is similar to Chris and Bryan's as well as I > have noticed that Anaconda has been getting considerably slower each > release. And in Fedora 5, Anaconda made the jump from requiring at least > 192MB of RAM for GUI to 256MB of RAM for GUI. Frankly I think 256MB for GUI is fair. And yet, I think Anaconda doesn't have NEARLY enough features -- it's too linear for my tastes. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list