On Tue, 18.12.07 15:22, Olivier Galibert (galibert@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Denis Leroy wrote: > > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > >>I am not convinced that PAM is the right place to start any daemons. > > > > > >But gdm is? > > > > why not start PA from an init script ? > > Something is still unclear to be. Are the PA deamons per-system, > per-user or per-login session? As mentioned earlier, PA may be run as system daemon. However, I do not recommend that. What I recommend is running it as a session/user daemon. Generally the daemon is designed to run per-user. However, some modules currently assume to be run per-session. Since currently multiple simultaneous logins per user are not really supported by GNOME anyway, I don't see it as a problem that PA in some areas acts as a per-user and in others as a per-session daemon. Except for the console login case we can safely assume that per-session and per-user is the same thing. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
