On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:57:06AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 17.12.07 16:34, Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > Hmm? If you want no X, then you certainly also don't want any PA. I > mean, last time I was in a server room I didn't see a single server > with boxes attached... ;-) It really depends. There are serious server rooms and there are home servers that are more multipurpose. For example one could be a streaming server so one could want to use it to listen to music too, but no X. But in any case it is not the point. It is plain wrong to specialize for a use (for example when logged with a specific dm). It shows that the whole design has flaws. The sound server should be usable in all situation from the start. Otherwise said, being able to adapt to all sort of situation should be in its design. That being said I don't know anything about pulseaudio, but if it is the same than consolekit which was designed without pam interfacing in mind it is not something I like. But, well I don't have the financial power to launch the writting of a sound server, so... -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
