On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:37:06AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > I disagree. It is mad to have something monolithic when there are > > different upstreams. > > Perhaps there could be a little less squabbling about which upstream is > theoretically better, and a little more focus on the problem that the > current combination of texlive with tetex-tex4ht produces unusable > garbage? I am focused on this. The tex4ht version is more up to date that the one that comes with texlive. > I get a big sweep of white space instead of a table of > contents. This doesn't happen on Fedora 7 or 6. Bugzilla is a better place for these discussion, please file a bug, with the document (if possible), the command-line and the output. Also did you tried the tex4ht version bundled with texlive and produced a correct document or is it a guess? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
