Re: texlive + tex4ht

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:37:06AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> 
> > I disagree. It is mad to have something monolithic when there are
> > different upstreams.
> 
> Perhaps there could be a little less squabbling about which upstream is
> theoretically better, and a little more focus on the problem that the
> current combination of texlive with tetex-tex4ht produces unusable
> garbage?  

I am focused on this. The tex4ht version is more up to date that the one
that comes with texlive.

> I get a big sweep of white space instead of a table of
> contents.  This doesn't happen on Fedora 7 or 6.

Bugzilla is a better place for these discussion, please file a bug, with 
the document (if possible), the command-line and the output.

Also did you tried the tex4ht version bundled with texlive and produced
a correct document or is it a guess?

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux