On 15/12/2007, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jindrich Novy wrote: > > > Yes, the rawhide TeXLive doesn't conflict with tex4ht (#411501) any > > more (version 2007-2 and on). > > By the way, someone pointed out that we should be packaging the tex4ht > that ships with texlive instead of using the old version. As the old > version of tex4ht seems to produce bad HTML files when used with the > texlive packages, I think it's worth a try. Well, to clarify, the options are: 1) remove the --without-tex4htk when building texlive so that the tex4ht binaries get built or 2) Continue to have an add-on package for tex4ht, which will require updating this package. This is a case where the Fedora "stick to upstream" doesn't resolve the dilemna - on the one hand texlive is an upstream, on the other, texlive4ht is an upstream. I do notice that upstream tex4ht has updates beyond the version included in texlive. That's true of many packages though, and it would be mad to start splitting everything out. Jindrich's call I guess. J. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
