On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:27:11PM -0600, Walter Gould wrote: > List, > > I need some guidance. I would like to build packages for a few perl > modules to be submitted. What is the overall view of using something > like cpan2rpm for building rpms or spec files? How would a package > built using this hold up during the review process? I am not real > experienced in building rpms but would really like to give getting these > modules included a shot. cpanspec generates much better spec files than cpan2rpm. The latter won't pass review at all, the former will be pretty close to correct - only minor tweaks required. Regards, Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list