On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:38:09 Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:27 +0100, Laurent Rineau wrote: > > Anyway, if I split ipe into two packages, or two sub-packages, how can I > > provide an upgrade path for users that assume that /usr/bin/figtoipe is > > provided by ipe, without adding a hard-coded Requires? I am not sure that > > a solution exists. > > Let both (sub-)packages do this: > > Obsoletes: ipe < 6.0-0.23.pre30 > Conflicts: ipe < 6.0-0.23.pre30 Ok, i see the point. > I hope your package isn't multilib, in this case current yum in F8 (I > have yum-3.2.7-1.fc8) would install both architectures even if > originally only one was installed. Well... ipe has a ipe-devel sub-packages, to let users create plugins (named ipelets). That makes ipe be a multilib package, as far as I know. Is there an extra trick to avoid the issue you have spotted? -- Laurent Rineau http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
