Re: Upstream package splitted into sub-packages: ipe, figtoipe.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:27 +0100, Laurent Rineau wrote:

> Anyway, if I split ipe into two packages, or two sub-packages, how can I 
> provide an upgrade path for users that assume that /usr/bin/figtoipe is 
> provided by ipe, without adding a hard-coded Requires? I am not sure that a 
> solution exists.

Let both (sub-)packages do this:

Obsoletes: ipe < 6.0-0.23.pre30
Conflicts: ipe < 6.0-0.23.pre30

I hope your package isn't multilib, in this case current yum in F8 (I
have yum-3.2.7-1.fc8) would install both architectures even if
originally only one was installed.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux