On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 20:16 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:51:14 -0500 > Jon Nettleton <jon.nettleton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Everything that it lacks is trumped by the integration with the > > gnome desktop. > > I had the exact opposite. I tried epiphany and I could find no > compelling reason to continue using it. I couldn't find one single > thing that it brought to the table that I either already got with > Firefox, or just plain didn't find useful. > > What do you mean by "integration" in this context, particularly beyond > what FF gets us. Let me clarify, in no particular order 1) Visual integration. Epiphany always matches the rest of my desktops applications. Some people might say "eh", but I find it much nicer. 2) When I am not connected to a network Epiphany goes to offline mode. 3) Right clicking and choosing view image launches eog where I can actually zoom in and see the image. I mean how useless is this feature in firefox? Select view image and it opens another enormous window showing the image at exactly the same size. 4) Possibly the thing that I love more than anything is the "Most Visited" topic pull-down. I bookmark sites, and the browser automatically keeps track of what I connect to most and gives me a nice pull down list. Don't get me wrong, I still use Firefox for serious development and the like. I just find the simplicity of epiphany quite nice for day to day browsing. Jon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
