On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 19:13 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 18:06 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:37:22PM +0100, Lubomir Kundrak wrote: > > > > Care to enlighten us? > > > No. > > > There is enough documentation available. > > > > That strikes me as rude, and inappropriate. It's also not the way to win > > a discussion point. > > It is also not the reason for firefox being the default. > I will try to add something constructive here. I think the main point of contention people have with epiphany is that, a) it lacks the brand recognition of firefox and b) it doesn't easily support firefox plugins/extensions. I switched to epiphany for F7 and personally I have no interest in going back. Everything that it lacks is trumped by the integration with the gnome desktop. I will say that my acceptance and enlightenment was only achieved through patience. I think using epiphany as a default for the desktop spin should be re-evaluated once it can be backended by either xulrunner or webkit. Really I think that decisions like this will be won by the community providing re-spins that offer alternatives. Jon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
